Book Review: Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck

Hey, friends. A couple of weeks ago, I finished Of Mice and Men for a summer reading assignment. Honestly, I feel like as soon as a book becomes required, a reader’s interest level drops upon introduction, and instead of the novel being read with intrigue and curiosity, it’s read with a sense of disdain.

Which was exactly how I felt upon picking up this book.

I knew I had to read, annotate, and answer, like, seventy discussion questions for that specific book’s assignment, and I wasn’t looking forward to it. I especially feel like the whole rhythm of reading is lost when you’re supposed to annotate. I just ended up reading the second half of the book without annotating, so I’ll torture myself later by going back and doing it, I guess.

John Steinbeck is considered a modern classic, and two of his most loved novels – Of Mice and Men and The Grapes of Wrath – were written and took place during the Great Depression. Of Mice and Men is about two men who were sent to work on a ranch in Soledad, California. We learn about the relationship between the two characters named George and Lennie, and delve into an understanding of a deeper, more complicated kind of codependency the two share.

Reading this novel with the knowledge we have now, my eyes were opened, and as soon as I finished the book I found myself researching – looking at post after post and even a few academic journals about some of the characters in the novel.


The compelling story of two outsiders striving to find their place in an unforgiving world. Drifters in search of work, George and his simple-minded friend Lennie have nothing in the world except each other and a dream–a dream that one day they will have some land of their own. Eventually they find work on a ranch in California’s Salinas Valley, but their hopes are doomed as Lennie, struggling against extreme cruelty, misunderstanding and feelings of jealousy, becomes a victim of his own strength. Tackling universal themes such as the friendship of a shared vision, and giving voice to America’s lonely and dispossessed, Of Mice and Men has proved one of Steinbeck’s most popular works, achieving success as a novel, a Broadway play and three acclaimed films.

This is a really short read, there are maybe a little over 100 pages, and the characters demonstrate thoughts and needs that are just so real you can’t help but empathize with some of the issues discussed. The ending, though…incredibly sad. I was in awe when I finished the book, and did all of the research to console myself.

Have any of you read Of Mice and Men? Definitely let me know if you liked it. If not, have you heard any strongly positive or negative reviews thus far? I’d love to know.

Cec ❤

5 thoughts on “Book Review: Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck

  1. I completely relate to what you said at the start of this review: I HAD to read this book, analyse it, annotate it, so I resented it. However, I’ve kind of come to appreciate and respect it more than I used to. Have you read any of Steinbeck’s other books that you could recommend? I feel like I should give him a second chance haha

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Well, the next book I have to read for my assignment is The Grapes of Wrath. It’s much thicker, there seems to be a little bit more structure, and I started it last night. Seem to be a lot of expositional chapters in the beginning, but I feel like if there’s more to come then I’m ready. 🙂 Have you gotten the chance to read that one?

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Hmm interesting – I’d love to know what you think when you’ve finished! And no, I haven’t – just Of Mice and Men (:

        Liked by 1 person

  2. When I had to do it, I hated it. I related with Lennie for a while, mentally screaming at George to treat him more humanely. Despite “keeping” him, he seemed sociopathic towards him.
    But the whole thing about killing mice, and then the dog, really turned me off. I understand why others like it, because it is good. I just can’t stand animal cruelty.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The thing to understand or keep in mind about Lennie is that people have been analyzing him on a psychological level for years now, some even submitting projects coming to conclusions about possible schizophrenic behavior or mental retardation (meaning his mind is developing at a much slower rate than those his age) for universities, and the way he was treated in this novel definitely reflects the thoughts most had in that time period. They just wrote it off as “dumb.” Something many people have noticed is that whenever he kills an animal, he always recognizes it as a bad thing, but never seems to completely understand it was his fault (he seems to blame the animals for dying). When he did that…thing at the end of the novel (no spoilers here, I promise) he knew he did something bad, but it didn’t seem like he remembered exactly what.
      I’m sorry if that seemed like a total attack on you 😦 I just meant to say that while what Lennie does is inexcusable, he doesn’t seem to be fully aware of exactly what he did wrong, based upon his actions.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close